| |
Cyber Means No Guru
Interview with Douglas Rushkoff
You can call Douglas Rushkoff a writer, consultant
or a futurist—he is equally successful in all three categories—but
I think that the most appropriate title for him is – interpreter.
Technically belonging to Generation X, Rushkoff dedicated one
of his books to his parents, for letting him watch the TV as
much as he wanted when he was a kid. Later, in equal quantities,
he consumed rave culture and Internet-ional society and today
he makes money interpreting Gen Xers and its mix of TV and computers
to the CEOs of the companies eager to sell to the young.
As always when a new name appears on the horizon, Rushkoff quickly
got his followers as well as opponents. Some specialized cyber-magazines
hate him. Salon calls him Faith Popcorn of his generation, and
Wired does not like him, either. Rushkoff says that this happens
because he is trying to demystify cyber-culture. Since publications
like Wired are practically founded on the grounds of mystification,
this animosity becomes explainable.
This 36-years old New Yorker is currently promoting his sixth
book, his first novel, Ecstasy Club (HarperCollins).
This is a story that mixes Grateful Dead, trips, rave, computers,
porn, conspiracy theory and almost anything else that could make
a book bestseller.
Once I got $7,500 for delivering
a talk at the same conference where [the executive
editor of Wired magazine] got $20,000 to deliver
a talk. They told me they got off cheap with me. |
Yes, the Ecstasy Club is superbly written
and it is almost impossible to put it aside once you started
reading, but...all Gen X ideals fall apart in this book and
the heroes sell themselves out to Cosmotology sect (sounds familiar?).
Although he flew previous night from Europe, where he taught
another group of rich folks how to become even richer, Douglas
Rushkoff looks fresh and active on the morning we meet on Victoria
Street. As he puts it, he likes to talk when he has an audience.
DT: Do you want people to adopt your ideas?
DR: No, I want people to have fun with
my ideas, I am an entertainer. That’s what someone once asked, “Are
you a priest, a writer, a philosopher?” No, I’m just an entertainer.
If I have a purpose, it’s to reduce the level of fear that people
have about technology, media, and the way the culture is changing.
DT: Some are seeing Information Technology more
as a goal than as tool. How do you use Internet?
DR: Right now, sadly, the Internet
for me is 150 messages in my Eudora Inbox, out of which 50 are
really angry about something. Whether it is KKK, that starting
writing to me for some reason, or Mac users who are angry because
of my article from Guardian where I explained why I switched
to PC. I’ve got over 400 messages regarding Mac, including one
dead threat. So, the Internet to me is a stage I passed through,
my entrance to the idea that the world can be one thing, that
we have to network ourselves somehow. But I got so much into
it, that I want to spend some time with the real people now.
DT: Everybody is talking about this great network,
about this total communication that comes with the Internet.
But I cannot read Japanese, nor French, nor Hungarian sites.
So, there is still that, the biggest barrier of them all – language.
Are we really communicating?
DR: We started to, and English is becoming
a generic language. So, when people somewhere are worried, “Oh,
this is a cultural imperialism from the West,” maybe it is true
on one hand, but America is loosing its culture on the other
hand. It will not exist anymore, because American culture will
be just one binary, generic language.
DT: What is the Internet today: just another
medium or a counterculture?
DR: Media itself is just an extension
of culture. I don’t see a division. Media to humanity is a honey
to a bee, a dam to a beaver-our natural extension. At the beginnings
of media, we needed someone in charge, CBC or Walter Kronkite,
whoever-they were the parents, the protectors. Now the media
has turned from the playground where we were watched into playground
where we all stand, where we can interact. The Internet was countercultural,
as long as the idea that human beings can express themselves
to one another without supervision was a countercultural idea.
But it’s less and less so. I don’t think it is a separate space,
I think it’s a mutation of the whole space.
There are psychedelic people out there
saying that if you haven’t had an LSD or DMT experience,
you will not make it into the next dimension. That’s
as just much crap as saying that if you don’t accept
Christ, you’ll not gonna make it after the Apocalypse. |
There will always
be the broadcast media, where people just want to relax and watch
something, but it will be forever affected by knowing that they
are not the only ones that can do it anymore. There are not priesthood
media anymore, except for some high-tech magazines who want to
establish themselves as a priesthood media and to remystify the
technology that was demystified by the Internet. I hated that
image that media tried to impose on me, that I was some kind
of cyber-guru guy. There is no such thing: cyber-guru is an oxymoron.
Cyber means no guru, it means it’s all out for grabs.
DT: Ecstasy Club starts as a documentary about new
generation, but ends almost as a preaching, as a lecture about
more traditional ways of life. Are you distancing now from the
culture that made you famous?
DR: Partially. This is my equivalent
of War of the Worlds. It is a stab in the back, but more than
that it is a poke. I was just as responsible as everyone else
for blowing up this balloon. That’s chill: we were all
taking ourselves a bit too seriously. That’s fine, but
if you go too far, it gets nutty. I can’t pull myself any
longer. Media portrayed me a lot as disembodied, Max Headroom,
little media genius guy, traveling all over, making tons of money.
I am not making that money. Yes, once I got $7,500 for delivering
a talk at the same conference where Kevin Kelly [executive editor
of Wired magazine]
got $20,000 to deliver a talk. They told me they got off cheap
with me. This is not an attack on my old friends, but an attack
on something that becomes fanatical, exclusive religion. There
are psychedelic people out there saying that if you haven’t
had an LSD or DMT experience, you will not make it into the next
dimension. That’s as just much crap as saying that if you
don’t
accept Christ, you’ll not gonna make it after the Apocalypse.
I wanted to break that circle and have a little fun, too. Usual
mistake than many people today make is that you can be happy
in discontinued way. I wanted that too, I was taking as much
drugs as I could, to break through...And we would dance and dance
and dance, “Our group is going to make it tonight, we will
break through time, we will make contact...” Nah, it won’t
happen like that. It’s gotta be married to real life.
[Douglas
Rushkoff Interview. Published in 1998]
© 1998
Dragan Todorovic, All rights reserved.
|
|